Go to http://www.carnell.com/population/paul_ehrlich.html "Overpopulation.Com" and read the article on Paul Ehrlich written by Brian Carnell.
Carnell states in his first paragraph that Paul Ehrlich is a persistent predictor of mass famine and economic catastrophe. Paul Ehrlich is, what is commonly described as a doomster and Brian Carnell a boomster.
Which perspective makes more sense to you, the one of the doomsayer or the one of the boomster?
Which perspective is more logical?
What logic would you use to support your opinion?